If a swamp frog goes ribb-it...ribb-it...ribb-it;
and a Busch frog goes bud...wis...er;
Then I guess a Windows 95 frog goes
Re-boot Re-boot Re-boot
At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 mi/gal."
Recently General Motors addressed this comment
by releasing
this statement:
"Yes, but would you want your car to crash twice a day?"
Top 10 Reasons We're Glad Microsoft Doesn't Build Cars
-
Every time they repainted the lines on the road you would
have to buy a new car.
-
Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no
reason, and you would just accept this, restart and
drive on.
-
Occasionally, executing a maneuver would cause your car to
stop and fail and you would have to re-install the engine.
For some strange reason, you would accept this too.
-
You could only have one person in the car at a time, unless
you bought "Car95" or "CarNT". But, then you would have to
buy more seats.
-
Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was
reliable, five times as fast, twice as easy to drive, but
would only run on five percent of the roads.
-
The Macintosh car owners would get expensive Microsoft
upgrades to their cars, which would make their cars run
much slower.
-
The oil, gas and alternator warning lights would be replaced
by a single "general car default" warning light.
-
New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.
-
The airbag system would say "are you sure?" before going off.
-
If you were involved in a crash, you would have no idea what
happened.
|
